<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft + Yahoo! = Meh!oo?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvtang.wordpress.com/2008/02/02/microsoft-yahoo-mehoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvtang.wordpress.com/2008/02/02/microsoft-yahoo-mehoo/</link>
	<description>Insanity, passion, and lolcats at a web startup</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 17:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: broadstuff</title>
		<link>http://tvtang.wordpress.com/2008/02/02/microsoft-yahoo-mehoo/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>broadstuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 14:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvtang.wordpress.com/?p=17#comment-8</guid>
		<description>[...] - Lets get down to the key question here   Vinh posted on his blog that us old hands here at Broadsight had already analysed That Deal - so we realised that we had to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; Lets get down to the key question here   Vinh posted on his blog that us old hands here at Broadsight had already analysed That Deal &#8211; so we realised that we had to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan p</title>
		<link>http://tvtang.wordpress.com/2008/02/02/microsoft-yahoo-mehoo/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>alan p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 13:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvtang.wordpress.com/?p=17#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Not sure I&#039;d say I&#039;d analysed it in any great detail yet :), more that the bid gaming surprised me.

Fwiw here is a &quot;fag packet&quot; analysis, you gets it here first ;)

- most industries do stably exist with a &quot;big 3&quot; where No 1 gets a lot of the loot, so I see no industry rationale per se
- MSFT of the big 3 has the biggest need to shift position as its old (and far larger) cash cow is declining, so that is probably the strategic driver to beef up here
- Its a good time to take out Yahoo - market and company sentiment is at low ebb
- Personally, I don&#039;t think its that dumb for MSFT to do this, in fact I&#039;m quite encouraged that they are being so bold - but execution is the issue in these cases as to making it work, and that will be hard, they are totally different businesses and cultures. AOL/Time Warner did not work at all for these reasons</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure I&#8217;d say I&#8217;d analysed it in any great detail yet :), more that the bid gaming surprised me.</p>
<p>Fwiw here is a &#8220;fag packet&#8221; analysis, you gets it here first ;)</p>
<p>- most industries do stably exist with a &#8220;big 3&#8243; where No 1 gets a lot of the loot, so I see no industry rationale per se<br />
- MSFT of the big 3 has the biggest need to shift position as its old (and far larger) cash cow is declining, so that is probably the strategic driver to beef up here<br />
- Its a good time to take out Yahoo &#8211; market and company sentiment is at low ebb<br />
- Personally, I don&#8217;t think its that dumb for MSFT to do this, in fact I&#8217;m quite encouraged that they are being so bold &#8211; but execution is the issue in these cases as to making it work, and that will be hard, they are totally different businesses and cultures. AOL/Time Warner did not work at all for these reasons</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles kelly</title>
		<link>http://tvtang.wordpress.com/2008/02/02/microsoft-yahoo-mehoo/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>charles kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 09:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvtang.wordpress.com/?p=17#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Consolidation in an over-valued industry is business and economics rolled into a &quot;not when, but how&quot; situation.

It&#039;s not the first company Microsoft has acquired. Nor the last I suspect. 

I was with Wang as they acquired two companies in succession before being bought by Getronics. The biggest problems there, as in most such acquisitions is consolidating duplicate functions and dealing with the human relations nightmares of layoffs, job shuffling and terminations. 

I don&#039;t see Microsoft having any problems with Yahoo other than the expected media barbs and criticisms. 

No matter what anyone says this will change the SEO industry and give Google something to think more seriously about. Microsoft usually enters the field last and in 2-3 years and revisions the product becomes popular, It is their history from my viewpoint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consolidation in an over-valued industry is business and economics rolled into a &#8220;not when, but how&#8221; situation.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not the first company Microsoft has acquired. Nor the last I suspect. </p>
<p>I was with Wang as they acquired two companies in succession before being bought by Getronics. The biggest problems there, as in most such acquisitions is consolidating duplicate functions and dealing with the human relations nightmares of layoffs, job shuffling and terminations. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see Microsoft having any problems with Yahoo other than the expected media barbs and criticisms. </p>
<p>No matter what anyone says this will change the SEO industry and give Google something to think more seriously about. Microsoft usually enters the field last and in 2-3 years and revisions the product becomes popular, It is their history from my viewpoint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
